Assess specific behaviors
The MTS-360 instrument offers a full 110-question assessment and a 19-question quick read across eight categories. Answers consider both the extent of a behavior and its importance to the role.
Managers That Suck / Management & improvement
Turn feedback into a better way to manage.
Managers That Suck gives employees, managers, and candidates a structured way to examine management behavior. Its product direction is to make the gap visible and give managers a practical path to improve.
The product idea
Make improvement visible.
The public experience pairs manager and company profiles with behavior-based assessments. Team feedback and self-assessment use the same instrument, so the difference between how a manager sees their work and how others experience it can become a starting point for change.
Inside the platform
Compare perspectives
Searchable manager profiles bring team and self-assessment into view. Category breakdowns help people identify where attention is needed and what behaviors would help.
Plan the next improvement
The manager experience identifies weaker areas and proposes weekly actions and a 30/60/90-day plan. Reassessment gives the product a way to keep attention on improvement over time.
The Crossform connection
What this work brings
to the next problem.
This is the human side of the Crossform story: useful measurement should lead to a decision, a concrete action, and another opportunity to learn. The product translates feedback into an operating loop that people can understand.
See the wider body of work ↗Where it stands
Public manager and company profiles, assessment choices, and the manager-improvement experience can be explored at managersthatsuck.com. The platform’s focus is specific behavior, practical action, and reassessment over time.
Portfolio review · 15 October 2026
The person behind the platform
How this platform
was made.
Managers That Suck was created and is directed by Philip Regenie. Its design connects structured observations of management behavior with assessment and improvement, making the underlying questions and patterns available for people to examine.
AI assistance supports implementation. Philip brings the product direction, knowledge across disciplines, architectural decisions, and review of the result.
Philip Regenie — background and portfolio ↗A conversation is a good place to start
Let’s make the next
move meaningful.
Bring the workflow, the ambition, or the problem that keeps coming back. We’ll work out where to begin.
Let’s discuss your system